Another heinous act occurred on May 22, 2022, when a mass shooting was witnessed in the small town of Uvalde in Texas, targeting the Robb Elementary School. Gary Titus, a swim coach, said nine students drowned, 19 children, and two educators died, although hundreds of other students were impacted. It left the community in devastation, and they were all searching for what was next to be done.

Nowadays, some individuals who survived the shooting and families of those who were all killed have filed a lawsuit. They are individually suing the delivery companies UPS and FedEx for failure to screen these customers adequately. In the lawsuits, it has been alleged that these companies were involved in the tragedy by conveying packages with the gun parts used in the shooting. These components have reportedly been ordered through the web and sent to the shooter, where it became possible for him to assemble the firearms used in the crime.

The claimants, the individuals claiming to have suffered from the defendant's acts, claim that UPS and FedEx should have known about the contents of these parcels and should have ceased their delivery. They think companies must adhere to correct processes and policies, and we understand that the shooter could not get the part he needed. The survivors and relatives of the deceased intend to make the companies pay for the practices they have allowed and, thus, to improve security measures regarding the shipment of hazardous materials.

The lawsuit's basis is the notion of 'shipment ility,’' which holds delivery service companies accountable for not shipping unlawful or harmful products. This position is difficult in the legal literature because it seeks to determine how much authority and information about shipment delivery companies should exercise. Licking to their claims, the plaintiffs have suggested that delivery companies should exercise all the precautions since the use of guns in the United States is Rampant.

UPS and FedEx, for their parts, have claimed that they observe all the laws and regulations currently in place for shipping. They cannot reasonably enforce this as they argue that it is almost impossible to open and inspect each package they deliver. They also emphasized engaging Cops to ensure that some consignments should not be shipped. Both of the companies have condemned the act and testified their meters with the victims and families. Still, the two companies deny having any role in the crime and say that a single person carried out such an act, but it does not in any way involve any companies who delivered the packages as people.

I would like to see what this lawsuit will hold for potential impacts on delivery companies that will be prevalent in the future. Some possible outcomes include new rules on monitoring shipped items, especially if the court supports the plaintiffs' claims and restricts the current freedom of shipping items that might be useful when assembling weapons. This could help the people constructing these vehicles get parts for their evil doings.

For the survivors of this heinous attack and the families of victims, this legal process is not about money; it is about change and the prevention of such a horrific event happening in the future. They choreograph these acts to bring change that may help shield other societies from such heinous acts. It will be a lengthy process concerning law, but so far, they are still firmly determined to seek actual accountability.